What does the EBOD prefix mean?

EBOD was E-BODY's main numbering prefix from 2007 until it ran out of numbers in 2023; EBWH carries the line now. Like most prefixes it is a catalogue identifier rather than an abbreviation you can decode, and the digits after it sequence releases within that line only.

Is E-BODY a genre or a label?

A label with a genre-defined casting brief. The distinction matters because a genre tag can be applied by any site, while a label controls casting, art direction and code allocation.

Does a cup size listed on a profile come from the label?

Usually from promotional material, which is marketing copy rather than a measured record. Our own data has bust-size coverage for 59% of named performers and we treat those values as reported, not verified.

E-BODY: Code Families and House Style

E-BODY is a Japanese adult video label whose casting is organised explicitly around body type, with a focus on fuller-figured and bust-forward performers. Its main numbering line ran under the EBOD prefix from 2007 until 2023 and continues as EBWH, and its house style puts the physical premise ahead of narrative.

E-BODY is a casting-brief label. Where a flagship label organises around contracted names and a drama label organises around scripts, E-BODY organises around body type — specifically fuller-figured, bust-forward casting — and builds its art direction to foreground it.

That single decision explains the whole catalogue: the framing, the wardrobe, the cover design, and the fact that its codes stayed on one long-running line rather than fragmenting into many parallel series.

What are the E-BODY code families?

One main line, unusually stable compared with labels that reset prefixes frequently — it took sixteen years to need a second prefix.

Prefix	Role	Status
EBWH	Current main numbering line	Current
EBOD	Previous main numbering line, long-running	Retired

Checked 2026-08-03 against E-BODY's own catalogue. EBWH succeeds EBOD rather than running beside it, and the handover is about as unambiguous as these get: EBOD-999 and EBWH-001 carry the same release date in July 2023. EBOD had run under one prefix since 2007, which is why the number still tells you something — see the reading rules below.

Reading rules:

A long-lived prefix means the number carries information. On a label that has kept one line running, a low EBOD number is genuinely early and a high one genuinely recent — which is not true of labels that reset every few years.
Numbers remain prefix-local. Do not compare an EBOD number against any other label's numbering.
Suffixes are downstream. Resolution, region and uncensored markers are added by distributors and re-uploaders, not by the label.

What does the E-BODY house style actually look like?

Physically framed and visually direct. The camera language favours full-body and mid-shot compositions over close coverage, wardrobe is chosen to make the casting brief legible, and cover design states the premise plainly rather than through narrative text.

Axis	E-BODY tends toward	Nearest contrast
Organising principle	Casting brief (body type)	Attackers: script and dramatic role
Framing	Full-body and mid-shot	Drama labels: coverage follows dialogue
Narrative weight	Minimal; premise is physical	Madonna: premise is relational
Cover copy	Direct, descriptive	MOODYZ: series identity forward
Casting	Cast to brief, roster rotates	S1: contracted names

How reliable are the body measurements you see on profiles?

Treat them as reported figures, not measurements. Bust size, height and three-size values circulating on profile pages originate in promotional material, get copied between aggregators, and are rarely updated.

Our own data reflects that unevenness honestly. As of the 2026-08 snapshot we have bust size for 59% of named performers, height for 57%, measurements for 56%, birth date for 56%, debut date for 59% and birthplace for 31%. Where a value is missing we leave it blank rather than filling it from a lower-quality source, and where it is present it is a reported value we have recorded — not something we have verified independently.

For a label whose whole positioning is physical, that is worth stating clearly: the casting brief is a real editorial decision by the label, but the specific numbers attached to any individual performer are marketing data of unknown provenance.

Why is body-type casting a label strategy at all?

Because it makes a catalogue searchable. A viewer who knows what they want in physical terms can navigate to a label directly, without reading a hundred title descriptions, and the label captures that demand consistently rather than competing across every genre at once.

The same logic explains why the majors run portfolios of narrow labels rather than one broad brand:

Narrow labels are findable. A specific brief becomes a shorthand.
Casting pipelines specialise. Agencies know which labels take which briefs, which streamlines booking. See how studios and talent agencies actually relate.
Art direction compounds. Repeating a visual formula over years makes each release instantly recognisable.

Why can't we tell you how many E-BODY titles exist?

Because we run a face index, not a release database.

The index holds 241,792 faces from 106 sites, resolving to 2,333 named performers (our index, 2026-08 snapshot), and the sampling is skewed in a way we disclose rather than hide: 2,246 of those 2,333 performers have their representative image from one single source site. That is a measure of exposure across our sources, not of any label's output.

So the only phrasing we will use is "titles we have indexed". Anyone quoting a precise release total for a label without naming a source is almost certainly reporting a storefront's listing count, which changes whenever that storefront's catalogue does.