Madonna is a single-genre label, and that focus is the whole proposition. It produces married-woman drama — the 人妻 (hitozuma) genre — casting adult women in stories built on domestic settings, marriages, households and the tensions inside them.
Where a generalist label spreads across many concepts, Madonna narrows to one and works it in depth. Its codes are correspondingly simple: a single main numbering chain, replaced periodically, plus two long-running side lines rather than a sprawl of parallel series prefixes.
What are the Madonna code families?
One main chain, with prefixes retired and replaced in order.
| Prefix | Role | Era |
|---|---|---|
| JUR | Current main line | From Dec 2024 |
| JUQ | Previous main line | 2022 to 2024 |
| JUL | Earlier main line | 2019 to 2022 |
| JUY | Earlier main line | 2016 to 2019 |
| JUX | Earlier main line | Before JUY |
| ROE | The label's MONROE line | Long-running, still active |
| URE | Separate Madonna line | Long-running, still active |
Checked 2026-08-03 against Madonna's own catalogue and FANZA product records.
The main chain hands over on the day: JUX-999 and JUY-001 share a release
date in October 2016, as do JUY-999 and JUL-001 in 2019 and JUL-999 and
JUQ-001 in 2022. ROE and URE are the two prefixes most often mis-filed
under other labels — both carry Madonna as the maker and both were still
receiving numbers in mid-2026.
Reading rules:
- A prefix change is a numbering reset. A performer with both JUL and JUQ titles stayed on the same label throughout.
- Numbers do not carry across prefixes. JUL-500 and JUQ-500 are unrelated.
- The JU- stem is not a guarantee. Other labels use two-letter stems that look similar. Match the full prefix, not the first two letters.
What does "married woman" actually mean as a genre?
It describes a character and a situation, not a fact about the performer. The convention sets the story inside a marriage or a household: a spouse, a neighbour, a domestic routine that the plot disturbs.
This distinction matters for two reasons. First, treating a genre label as a biographical claim about a real person is exactly the kind of unverified statement worth avoiding. Second, it explains why the same performer can appear in this genre on one label and in a completely different register elsewhere — she is being cast into a role, and roles are what labels specialise in.
The genre's stylistic markers are consistent enough to recognise on sight:
| Marker | Typical treatment |
|---|---|
| Setting | Home interiors, everyday domestic space |
| Casting age register | Adult, presented as established rather than newly debuting |
| Narrative stakes | Relationship consequence, secrecy, household disruption |
| Pacing | Slower setup, dialogue and situation before anything else |
| Cover design | Title text carries the premise; typography-heavy |
How does Madonna differ from adjacent labels?
By register rather than by category. Several labels work with adult casting and domestic themes; what separates them is the emotional key they play in.
| Label | Register | Emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| Madonna | Domestic drama | Marriage, household, relationship stakes |
| Attackers | Suspense and confrontation | Scripted conflict, thriller structure |
| MOODYZ | Genre-wide | Many concepts, series-led |
| S1 | Glossy flagship | Contracted performers, polished look |
Reading a catalogue this way is more useful than reading genre tags, because tags describe content while a label describes treatment — and treatment is what makes two titles with identical tags feel nothing alike.
Why can't we tell you how many Madonna titles exist?
Because we index faces, not release catalogues. There is no honest way for us to produce a total, so we do not publish one.
Our index, as of the 2026-08 snapshot: 241,792 indexed faces across 106 sites, resolving to 2,333 named performers. The sampling is uneven and disclosed — 2,246 of those 2,333 performers have their representative image from a single source site. Biographical field coverage is partial: birth date 56%, bust size 59%, debut date 59%, height 57%, measurements 56%, birthplace 31%.
Note what the low birth-date coverage implies for a genre organised around age register: we frequently cannot state a performer's age, and we will not infer it from how she is cast. Genre positioning is a marketing decision by a label, not a biographical record.
What should you know before searching by genre rather than by code?
Genre queries return treatments, not titles. If you liked a specific title, the faster route is usually the label plus the performer, not the genre keyword — genre terms are applied inconsistently across sites and often by automated tagging.
Where genre keywords do help is discovery: they are a reasonable way to find which performers work in a register you are interested in, and from there you can follow individual filmographies, which are far more reliable than tags.
Related questions
- The major Japanese adult video studios, explained
- Attackers: the drama label explained
- MOODYZ: code families and house style
- What does it mean to be an "exclusive" performer?
- How studios and talent agencies actually relate
Looking for a performer rather than a genre? Search by face — detection runs in your browser, only a cropped region is sent, and matches link into keyword pages covering 300 terms in 13 languages.